Challenge
Initial screening was time-consuming and inconsistent across reviewers. Valuable evidence was easy to miss, yet an automated decision would create unacceptable fairness and governance risk.
Approach
The workflow extracts job criteria and candidate evidence into a common schema. It highlights matches, gaps and questions for a human reviewer without ranking protected characteristics or making the decision.
- Explicit, reviewable job criteria
- Evidence-linked candidate summaries
- Bias and data-minimisation controls
- Human decision and feedback capture
Outcome
Reviewers receive a more consistent starting point and a visible evidence trail. The system supports judgment rather than replacing it.
